In honor of Halloween, I thought I’d look
at Marvel’s horror line from the 1970’s, specifically, the flagship of that
line – the longest-running, and most respected, Tomb Of Dracula.
To backtrack a bit: at the beginning of the decade, DC had
started to score with a series of new or revivified horror/mystery anthology
titles: House Of Mystery, House Of Secrets, (Tales Of The) Unexpected, et
al. Part of what made this possible was
a loosening of the comics code, which now allowed the long-banned use of
classic monsters and some G-rated grue.
DC’s so-called “mystery” line is worth a story itself, and some day I’ll
write one. But for now, suffice it to
say, DC pounced on the chance and hit paydirt.
Needless to say, as they had done in `61, Marvel looked at
DC’s success and quickly moved to do their own version of the same boogie,
launching a bunch of horror anthology titles.
Unlike DC, Marvel’s all flopped.
This too is a story to be told, some other time.
Undaunted, Marvel also took a stab at horror comics with
continuing characters (DC had also scored with The Phantom Stranger and Swamp
Thing, after all), and thus unleashed what was essentially their own take on
the classic Universal monsters roster: Frankenstein, a mummy, a werewolf, and
not one but two vampires – Morbius, the Living Vampire (a sci-fi vampire who
had done a few turns in Spider-Man’s titles), and the granddaddy vamp of them
all, Count Dracula.
As usual, Jack Kirby had the idea first:
Jack had this idea to do a book called Dracula, which he
thought was going to be very commercial. His idea was to do Dracula at
different time periods, an anthology book. One story might have had him in the
present day, one story might have him in the past, another would have him in
the future. He made the presentation to DC, and Carmine said, "Yeah, we'll
get to it, we'll get to it." Then Marvel announced the same idea [with Dracula Lives!]. (Mark Evanier, reported
by John Morrow in Jack Kirby Collector 13)
Whether Marvel got wind of Jack’s Drac book, or came up with
the idea themselves, regardless, Tomb of Dracula hit the racks in April `72,
with a story by Gerry Conway and art by the very fine Gene Colan:
ToD 1 is a fun little romp that pretty well illustrates the
pros and cons of the title from its inception.
Frank Drake, an American playboy and son of wealth has blown his family
fortune, and his down on his luck when his bud Clifton points out that the old
diary, the one written by one Prof. Van Helsing, that’s in Frank’s possession,
is the clue to a potential goldmine. You
see, Frank Drake is, in fact, a descendant of the famous Count himself, and
there really is a Castle Dracula in Transylvania ,
and Frank Drake owns it. If they were to
restore the old bat trap, turn it into a tourist attraction ….Off go Frank, Clifton , and Jeanie, the girl Frank stole from Clifton , to Transylvania ….
Which turns out to be straight out of a Universal or Hammer
film, complete with 19th-century-style village and villagers, and
even a horse-drawn coach ride to Castle Drac, in the midst of a storm (of
course the villagers tell them not to go.
Of course the carriage driver leaves them out in the storm to walk the
rest of the way to the castle, cuz he won’t go near it).
So, stumbling around in the castle, which is all kinds of
spooky and full of (of course) bats, the three get separated. Clifton
falls through some rotted floorboards into a crypt, where he finds Drac’s
stake-impaled skeleton, resting in a coffin.
Now Clifton, assuming that this is merely the remains of some poor sucker who fooled the local populace into believing he actually was a vamp, and got a stake through his heart for his trouble. So what does
This, it turns out, is all it takes to bring Drac back to
death, so to speak. And soon the ol’
Count is all over the castle, terrorizing Frank and Jeanie. And, despite Frank’s desperate and
not-entirely-believing-at-first efforts, Jeanie ends up vamped.
So, you can see, we have, as I said, a fun little romp in
the Universal and Hammer mode, with some nice, atmospheric artwork, and,
frankly, a pretty healthy dose of the preposterous (why in god’s name would Clifton have pulled that
stupid stake out? Why does Jeanie fly
off instead of vamping Frank at the end?).
I’ve seen worse starts.
Issue 2 carries on, with Drac and Jeanie trailing Frank to London (where he’s run
off, taking Drac’s coffin with him.
Apparently Gerry hadn’t studied his Stoker, since Drac always had plenty
of coffins). There’s some nice business
with Drac stalking early 70’s London ,
of a sort I would have liked to see continued (Drac actually tries to pass
himself off as a normal, albeit eccentric, contemporary man. This approach was later abandoned
completely).
The issue ends with Jeanie staked and Drac fled, after
another confrontation with Frank.
#3 is the series first milestone, as new writer Archie
Goodwin introduces the all-important supporting characters, Rachel Van Helsing
– descendant of Prof. Van Helsing, obsessed vampire hunter, and hot babe; her
mentor, Quincy Harker, son of Jonathan and Mina – bound to a wheelchair loaded
with Bond-ian vampire killing gadgets, and Quincy’s good right arm, the silent
Hindu giant, Taj.
It also introduces a regrettable,
all-too-frequently-recurring trope for the series – the Big Showdown, in which
Frank, Quincy ,
Rachel, and Taj (or some combination of some of the above), confront
Dracula. This inevitably leads to the
following scenario: each member of the group attacks Drac, one at a time (the
idea of all ganging up on him at once is apparently to strategically
sophisticated for this bunch), while spouting tiresome variations on statements
such as: “you may think I’m just a weakling, but this time I’m going to kill
you, Dracula” (Frank) and “this time you will not escape, evil one!” (Rachel)
and “this is our final battle, this time, Dracula!” (Quincy ).
Fortunately, Taj, being mute, is spared such a speech. Drac, meanwhile, knocks them around,
inevitably spouting variations on: (to Frank) “spineless jellyfish, how could
you be descended from me?!?” (to Rachel) “cold-hearted witch, your crossbow
will not help you!” and (to Quincy )
“old fool – this time I will finish you!”
This scene is repeated throughout the run of the
series. Inevitably it goes nowhere –
Drac always bails uninjured and never manages to do any serious harm to his
opponents. The “this time it will be
different” speeches they keep making at each other quickly become comical
through repetition.

Wolfman has written just about every title in the Marvel canon, as well as devising a few of his own. He has written many comics – some have been quite good; a few have been embarrassingly bad. Wolfman’s writing on the title has been praised to the heavens, but it is not without its flaws. Prose-wise, it was consistently very good. The characterization was very strong. Wolfman shared, in fact, probably improved upon, Stan Lee’s concept of fleshing out characters by giving them believable, relatable motivations that worked no matter how absurd the context. Thus, he began to put meat on the bones of these characters. And what was notable was that they were deeply flawed characters; deeply troubled people. Frank Drake was tortured by feelings on inadequacy, constantly trying to prove he was something more than a pampered, broke playboy. Rachel is so driven to kill Drac that she had nothing else to live for – not even her alleged love for Frank.
Still Wolfman made several mistakes. Early on, he established that Drac had been
alive and active throughout history.
Pretty soon it seemed there were very few years that Drac hadn’t been up
and drinking. This rather undercut the
whole concept of his being revived at Castle Dracula (he hadn’t been dead more
than 4 years, tops, in 1972). Making
Drac that easy to kill and revive rather cheapened the whole thing. Also, many of Wolfman’s early issues suffer
from some truly dumb plot turns. This
reaches its nadir with issue 19 (“Snowbound In Hell”) in which Drac and Rachel
are stuck in the midst of a blizzard in the Carpathians after her helicopter
crashes. This starts off on a bad note
(when the copter took off at the end of the previous ish, Frank had been in
it. Now he had inexplicably vanished,
and was back in London with Quincy .
Huh?) and gets steadily worse, as Drac keeps a broken-legged Rachel
alive, even finding food for her and intending to return her to civilization,
while she continually tries to kill him.
Ostensibly Drac keeps her alive in order to feed on her later, since he
expects it to be days before they can get out of the blizzard. However, despite being entirely capable of
using his oft-demonstrated hypnotic power on her, or simply biting her and
enslaving her (another trick he’s done numerous times before), he simply lets
her keep trying to stake him until, finally fed up, he tries to kill her, but
is stopped when he is attacked by a ….flesh-eating mountain goat. Yes, you heard it here first, folks. Ish 19 is an embarrassment.
The series carried on its way, getting even dumber with the
introduction of Dr. Sun, a brain-in-a-tank which captures Drac and the vampire
hunters. The less said of Dr. Sun the
better, but Marv apparently liked him – he returned in other Wolfman-penned
titles. By this point in reading the
series, I’d started to rule ToD to be a rather overrated bummer.
gotta watch out for those killer mountain goats... |
And then, something happened.
Issue 22 kicked off with a new story, “In Death Do We Join,”
the story of a violent, abusive man who returns as a vampire to haunt his
long-suffering wife. This ends in a
cemetery-set showdown between Drac and this new, arrogant vamp. And the story is remarkable. After so many duds, I confess to picking up
this issue with a certain sneer, only to have that sneer wiped off by a
genuinely powerful, and haunting tale that will stay with me for a long time. “In Death Do We Join” is one of the finest
tales, and easily one of the finest horror tales, Marvel would ever produce.
What follows is a series of very strong issues. Dracula takes possession of Castle Dunwick,
wherein he finds one Shiela Whittier, a fragile young woman who is being
terrorized by her father’s ghost. Drac,
for reasons of his own, exorcises the ghost, and he and Shiela begin a strange
relationship, Drac surprised by his own ability to care for the delicate mortal
woman, Shiela by the contrast between what she knows to be Drac’s nature, and the
way that he cares for her. The vampire
hunters, thinking Drac to have died in a train crash several issues back, go
their own separate ways. In issue 25,
Wolfman introduces another vampire – Hannibal King, a hard-boiled detective who
hunts vampires and, is himself, a vamp.
This too is completely successful issue and widely (and rightly) considered a classic
Issues 26-28 involve the search for, and acquisition of, a
powerful magic artifact called “the chimera,” which can be used for good or
evil (guess which one Drac wants it for?).
This is a strong and satisfying storyline, similar to ones Wolfman would
pursue less successfully in his later Night Force series. It ends in a surprising epilogue in which
Drac, enraged by Shiela Whittier’s rejection (she turns away from him when his
cruelty and evil nature become too apparent for her to ignore during his quest
for the chimera), seeks revenge on her.
Shiela manages to deny him even that, though she loses her life. The jealous, bitter and twisted Dracula that
appears in this epilogue has never been more despicable … or more painfully
human. The equally-remarkable following
issue is a kind of epilogue to the epilogue, in which Dracula reflects on
previous defeats and frustrations: a noblewoman who engaged him to kill her
husband in order to help Otto Von Bismarck take power; a blind child whose
abusive father Dracula murders as an act of vengeance on the child’s part for
murdering her mother. The girl does not
appreciate this act. An early encounter
with Blade is also recounted.
Unfortunately, it wouldn’t last.
With issue 37, Drac arrived in America
(Boston , to be
precise), and the title started to slide downhill. First, we’re treated to the spectacle of Drac
and Blade fighting a U.S.
army platoon mind-controlled by Dr. Sun.
This tiresome Captain America-reject plot took five goddam issues to play
itself out. Secondly, Wolfman introduced
the painfully unfunny comic relief character Harold H. Harold, an irritating
nebbish who spent most of his time whining and generally behaving like a
twelfth-rate Woody Allen character.
Wolfman seemed to like him, though.
He stayed around to the end of the series.
![]() |
the painfully un-amusing Harold H. Harold |
From here, the series became hit-and-miss. A one-off riff on TV’s “Kolchak: The Night
Stalker” in issue 43 was rewarding. A long
story involving Drac’s takeover of a satanic cult, and finding actual love with
one of its members, a woman named Domini, with whom Drac would in fact, father
a child, had much of the series previous glory in it. But an unexpected appearance by the Silver
Surfer was an unfortunate and unwelcome direction for the series. It seemed no sooner had the series peaked,
then it declined precipitously.
Around issue 60, Wolfman began to right the ship a bit. Domini gives birth to Drac’s son, who is
killed by deposed cult leader Anton Lupeski.
Domini, using strange magic, and opposed by Dracula, resurrects their
son, Janus, who is apparently reborn as some kind of angel (though he looks
like a third-rate superhero), who, while professing his love for Drac, still
fights him (potentially) to the death.
The series becomes weirdly metaphysical, with Janus making vague pronouncements
about Dracula’s demise being foretold by destiny, while Drac has a
confrontation with Satan himself, pissed off over various foolish deeds of
Drac’s. Drac ends up banished to earth
as a mortal. Desperate, he hunts down
his daughter, Lilith, to re-vamp him.
Lilith, still pissed over Drac’s murdering her mother several hundred
years prior, refuses and chases him all over New York instead.

It was also pretty much the end. In that issue’s letter column, Wolfman
announced that both he and Colan would be leaving the title with issue #
72. In fact, there would no issue 72.

In fact, it would be 4 months before issue 70 appeared, in a
bastardized version – the final three issues had been written and drawn. Jim Shooter forced Wolfman to cram the
material into one double-sized final issue. Though somewhat compressed, the story, which covers Drac's return to vampiric form, his trial-by-combat with the ersatz leader of the vampire tribe, his final showdown with Quincy Harker and, finally, an aftermath in which the characters try to prepare to move on with their lives. It was a worthwhile end to an erratic but often impressive series.
It was not quite the end of Dracula as a Marvel property. He continued for another year in a b&w magazine-size spin-off called, again, Tomb of Dracula. It lasted six issues (there was also the Dracula Lives b&w from `73-`75, and Giant-Size Dracula, a comic-size annual that produced five issues. I'll talk about those some other time, as well as the b&w Tomb, some other time). The horror boom was off. Drac faded from the scene other than sporadic guest appearances. In 1983, a Doctor Strange story had all vampires in the Marvel universe wiped out - which I guess tells you how far the vampire star had fallen for the House Of Ideas.
In 1991, spurred in part I suppose by the Francis Ford Coppola film, Marvel reprinted several key Drac stories, and ran a four-part miniseries entitled Tomb Of Dracula, with Wolfman and Colan at the helm again. It was an unsettling piece, with Drac being resurrected yet again, this time by an overzealous, and foolish, occult researcher hoping to achieve vampiric immortality. The mini-series was reminiscent of Wolfman/Colan's 80's Night Force series, what with its campus cultists and attempts to raise massive amounts of psychic energy to achieve some nefarious goal. It was darker - we learn that Rachel died an embittered alcoholic and Blade has become a near-homicidal maniac. Only Frank seems to have found happiness, with a new wife - until she's kidnapped, possessed by the spirit of the dead Rachel, and drawn into Drac's plans for revenge and domination. Freed from the restraints of the comics code and the mores of an earlier decade, Wolfman/Colan indulged themselves in all the sexuality, violence and gore they could only hint at in the original run - to the point where it became ludicrous (Drac tearing apart a strip club, gouging out eyes and tearing off faces). Colan's was not the draftsman he once was, and here he let himself go with wild, twisted panels and montages - he was no doubt aiming for surreal, but the effect was often more sloppy and grotesque. But it was a good story, with a spectacular ending. It wasn't a bad epilogue.
What's left to say? ToD was a good horror comic - probably Marvel's best horror comic, overall. But it had as many failures as it did successes. The first three issues (mostly to set the scene), issues 22-36, and 60-70 - and a few scattered winners - slightly less than half its run. It was a good series, but, given its rep, I wish it had been more.
It was not quite the end of Dracula as a Marvel property. He continued for another year in a b&w magazine-size spin-off called, again, Tomb of Dracula. It lasted six issues (there was also the Dracula Lives b&w from `73-`75, and Giant-Size Dracula, a comic-size annual that produced five issues. I'll talk about those some other time, as well as the b&w Tomb, some other time). The horror boom was off. Drac faded from the scene other than sporadic guest appearances. In 1983, a Doctor Strange story had all vampires in the Marvel universe wiped out - which I guess tells you how far the vampire star had fallen for the House Of Ideas.
In 1991, spurred in part I suppose by the Francis Ford Coppola film, Marvel reprinted several key Drac stories, and ran a four-part miniseries entitled Tomb Of Dracula, with Wolfman and Colan at the helm again. It was an unsettling piece, with Drac being resurrected yet again, this time by an overzealous, and foolish, occult researcher hoping to achieve vampiric immortality. The mini-series was reminiscent of Wolfman/Colan's 80's Night Force series, what with its campus cultists and attempts to raise massive amounts of psychic energy to achieve some nefarious goal. It was darker - we learn that Rachel died an embittered alcoholic and Blade has become a near-homicidal maniac. Only Frank seems to have found happiness, with a new wife - until she's kidnapped, possessed by the spirit of the dead Rachel, and drawn into Drac's plans for revenge and domination. Freed from the restraints of the comics code and the mores of an earlier decade, Wolfman/Colan indulged themselves in all the sexuality, violence and gore they could only hint at in the original run - to the point where it became ludicrous (Drac tearing apart a strip club, gouging out eyes and tearing off faces). Colan's was not the draftsman he once was, and here he let himself go with wild, twisted panels and montages - he was no doubt aiming for surreal, but the effect was often more sloppy and grotesque. But it was a good story, with a spectacular ending. It wasn't a bad epilogue.
What's left to say? ToD was a good horror comic - probably Marvel's best horror comic, overall. But it had as many failures as it did successes. The first three issues (mostly to set the scene), issues 22-36, and 60-70 - and a few scattered winners - slightly less than half its run. It was a good series, but, given its rep, I wish it had been more.